Nov 162011
 

For Shame Obama

As many of you know, I’ve been tending to my own life as of late. Through quiet observations and a strong distrust of our Government, I felt the Occupy invasions were the brain child of the administration. Compelled to find out the truth, I started searching for the answers. What about Homeland Security? You remember them, the real secret Government behind the scenes. At least sometimes behind the scenes.

justicedeptraids
“President Obama’s “position” regarding the NYPD’s raid of Zuccotti Park, is that “every municipality has to make its own decision about how to handle” the issues of free speech and the concerns of the community. But according to Rick Ellis at the Examiner, a Justice Department official says that the recent evictions of Occupy movement across the country including Salt Lake City, Denver, Portland, Oakland, and New York City were “coordinated with help from Homeland Security, the FBI and other federal police agencies”.

“Ellis reports that his source says though the decision to evict protesters ultimately rested with each individual jurisdiction, the local police departments “had received tactical and planning advice from national agencies” from the feds.”

“Oakland’s mayor Jean Quan told the BBC yesterday that she had participated in a conference call with the leaders of 18 other cities to discuss their shared “situation where what had started as a political movement and a political encampment ended up being an encampment no longer in control by the people who started them.”

Mother Jones reports that the US Conferences of Mayors has stated that two conference calls, one on October 13, the morning before the aborted raid on Zuccotti Park, and the second on November 10, were held with “mayors and police top brass.” They discussed “issues of concern” and how to “maintain public health and safety” during the occupations. The USCM official “denied that there was any coordination or planning between mayors and police officials about breaking up Occupy protests or tearing down encampments.” Mayor Bloomberg denies participating in these conference calls.

In our recent interview with Glenn Greenwald, a former civil rights attorney and current Salon columnist, we asked him a question regarding the expanding powers of the federal government.
“Typically, new powers are often applied in ways that people will feel comfortable with. So if the government wants to restrict speech they will pick the most hated person in the society and restrict their speech and nobody will care…The problem is that these things proliferate far beyond their original applications, in every instance that’s true. Historically, that’s how power functions.”

According to a Presidential directive issued by George W. Bush in 2003, the DHS’s responsibility is to “develop all-hazards plans and capabilities, including those of greatest importance to the security of the United States homeland, such as the prevention of terrorist attacks and preparedness for the potential use of weapons of mass destruction, and ensure that state, local, and federal plans are compatible.” Is assisting to coordinate the eviction of mostly-peaceful protests what the DHS was designed to do?

According to an anonymous Justice Department source, the Feds helped the mayors of Occupy cities plan their raids for maximum effect and minimum fallout. These included:
Seek a legal reason to evict residents of tent cities, focusing on zoning laws and existing curfew rules.
Demonstrate a massive show of police force, including large numbers in riot gear.
FBI advised that any moves to evict protesters be done at a time when the press was the least likely to be present.
demotix.com

boston.com

washingtonpost

examiner
gothamist

http://motherjones.com/mojo/2011/11/occupy-protest-coordinate-crackdown-wall-street

www.usmayors

dhs.gov

November 16, 2001
Civil Rights Legal Groups Demand Records on Federal Law Enforcement Involvement in Coordinated Crackdown on Occupy Movement
PCJF and NLG Mass Defense Committee File Multi-Agency Requests

The Partnership for Civil Justice Fund (PCJF) and the National Lawyers Guild Mass Defense Committee filed Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests today with the Department of Justice, Department of Homeland Security, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), and the National Park Service (NPS) requesting that the agencies release information that they possess related to the involvement of federal agencies in the planning of a coordinated law enforcement crackdown that has taken places in multiple cities against the Occupy Movement in recent days and weeks.
The FOIA to the various federal law enforcement agencies states: “This request specifically encompasses disclosure of any documents or information pertaining to federal coordination of, or advice or consultation regarding, the police response to the Occupy movement, protests or encampments.”
The Occupy Movement has been confronted by a nearly simultaneous effort by local governments and local police agencies to evict and break up encampments in cities and towns throughout the country. It is now known that mayors and other local officials have met together on conference calls in recent weeks and developed a coordinated strategy to dislodge and break up the encampments using common talking points including a public pretextual rationale to justify police action.
Mara Veheyden-Hilliard, Executive Director of the Partnership for Civil Justice and the co-chair of the National Lawyers Guild’s National Mass Defense Committee, states: “The severe crackdown on the occupation movement appears to be part of a national strategy to crush the movement. This multi-jurisdictional coordination shows that the crackdown is supremely political.”
“The FOIA requests seek critical information regarding the role of federal law enforcement agencies,” Verheyden-Hilliard explained. “The Occupy demonstrations are not criminal activities, and police should not be treating them as such. This protest movement for social and economic justice has captured the imagination of the country. The coordinated effort of law enforcement to suppress it is a reflection of its political challenge to the status-quo.”
“We see the scapegoating of these movements, the attacks at night, and in general tactics designed to terrorize and to scare protesters away,” stated Heidi Boghosian, Executive Director of the National Lawyers Guild. “This request is critical to the transparency that is required in order for the people of the United States to be informed as to the U.S. government’s action in regard to free speech activities.”

Read the Freedom of Information Act request here:

“The Partnership for Civil Justice Fund (PCJF) is a not-for-profit constitutional rights legal and educational organization which, among other things, seeks to ensure constitutional accountability within police practices and government transparency in operations. It is counsel on the Barham and Becker class action cases in which more than 1,000 persons were falsely arrested during protests in Washington, D.C., resulting in settlements totaling $22 million and major changes in police practices. The PCJF previously brought the successful litigation in New York challenging the 2004 ban on protests in the Great Lawn of Central Park. It is counsel with the National Lawyers Guild in Oakland, CA challenging police mass arrest tactics. It won a unanimous ruling at the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals finding the MPD’s unprecedented military-style police checkpoint program unconstitutional. The PCJF previously uncovered and disclosed that the D.C. police employed an unlawful domestic spying and agent provocateur program in which officers were sent on long-term assignments posing as political activists and infiltrated lawful and peaceful groups. For more information go to: www.JusticeOnline.org.
The National Lawyers Guild was formed as the nation’s first racially integrated voluntary bar association, with a mandate to advocate for fundamental principles of human and civil rights including the protection of rights guaranteed by the United States Constitution. The Guild has championed the First Amendment right to engage in vigorous political speech for 75 years. The Guild has a long history of defending individuals accused by the government of espousing “dangerous” ideas, including in hearings conducted by the House Committee on Un-American Activities and other examples of governmental overreaching now popularly discredited. See e.g. Kinoy v. District of Columbia, 400 F.2d 761 (1968). Since then, it has continued to represent thousands of Americans critical of government policies, from civil rights advocates and anti-war activists during the Vietnam era to current anti-globalization, peace, environmental and animal rights activists. Its Mass Defense Committee is a coordinated body of hundreds of lawyers, legal workers and law students who are defending the free speech rights of the Occupy actions around the country.
justiceline.org

So I’m not the only one who attributes raids on the Camps as being sourced to the Obama administration. I feel for sure that information is being gathered on the demonstrators. They of course are filming what ever they can. Mr.President, you could have won back your base with just a nod of your head. Support the movement and condemn the atrocities the Gestapo has wrought. Oh right you can’t because they’re following your orders.

 Posted by at 7:39 pm

  6 Responses to “For Shame Obama”

  1. Why does this not make sense to me?

    I get that he and others believe the conspiracy theory of FBI, Homeland security et.al met up by some means whether online or in person to establish plans to thwart the Occupy movement. To some extent I agree because I know that city and county governments have had to make plans for every conceivable emergency and this is just a few scenario’s since at least shortly after 1990.

    He does a great job with his documentation and coverage of how you request information by filing Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests and what they expect to see. Also very good arguments against what they believe happened. But I didn’t see the answer. Did I fall asleep? Did you before you finished?

    • Mary first thank you for reading and then responding to my post. This is my first in a long time and so I may be rusty. In actuality a lot of it is conjuncture until we get answers from the freedom of Information act. The mayors conference call was established and so we know it was a united effort to quell the OWS. I believe it was someone in the administration. Time will bear this out. It’s funny Obama calls for protestors to be treated properly in other countries but in our own we pepper spray 82 year old ladies. It so reminds me of the 60s. Back then the FBI had a history on protestors and people thought to be a danger. These days all agencies report to Homeland security. I have to assume they report to Obama.

  2. Glad to see you back Tim hope you can post more.

    I always thought that Obama was a constitutional scholar. It turns out he has forgotten what he learned or has been bought off. The authorities think that this movement would be killed once the camps were broken up. Nothing could be farther from the truth it’s only made them stronger. Now rather than sitting around camping and waving signs the real work begins. I think in the end this may land up one of the largest political changes in U.S. history. Everyone realizes that the two party system has been corrupted by the money of Wall Street. As Alan Grayson put it so well we now have the meanies and the weenies. And neither party is doing the country much good.
    But let me end by saying you won’t see any of this on TV because as we all know the revolution will not be televised it’s right here in cyberspace.

  3. Great to have you back at the keyboard.

    Yep, Obama is an uber-douchebag and he has gone from bad to worse. From signing a terrible Republican-back bill to lift the ban on horse slaughterhouses (I will not forgive this) to his decision to fan the flames of war with Iran.

    But, the GOP field is even more disgusting. Not a one would convince me to cast a vote for them.

    I honestly don’t know what I will do next Nov. 6, 2012. The myth of a “third party” candidate is just tossing my vote away. So is voting Green. The two parties have a true stranglehold on the franchise.

    For the first time in my adult life, I may very well stay home.

 Leave a Reply

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Share be a pal and share this would ya?
For Shame Obama